USPTO serial 86855107
MAXYMIZELY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, DONALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXYMIZELY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivian Ortiz Ponce
VIVIAN ORTIZ PONCE MARCAS ESTADOS UNIDOSPO BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for monitoring and analyzing use and trends of use of websites and mobile applications, identify the most successful targeting segments for marketing campaigns, and decrease inefficiencies; Downloadable cloud computer software for monitoring and analyzing use and trends of use of websites and mobile applications, identify the most successful targeting segments for marketing campaigns, and decrease inefficiencies; Downloadable computer software for monitoring and analyzing use and trends of use of websites and mobile applications, identify the most successful targeting segments for marketing campaigns, and decrease inefficiencies | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 3, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |