USPTO serial 86855127
KINETIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KINETIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harris A. Wolin
HARRIS A WOLIN MYERS WOLIN LLC100 HEADQUARTERS PLAZAMORRISTOWN, NJ 07960UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wearable sensors for determining position and movement, namely, velocity and acceleration, for use in workplace ergonomics and safety analytics; non-medical sensors to be worn by humans for monitoring movements for use in workplace ergonomics and safety analytics; software for monitoring and assessing human ergonomics and workplace performance | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Development of software, hardware, and technology solutions, and provision of non-downloadable cloud-based software, hardware, and technology solutions for the purpose of evaluating, monitoring or assessing human ergonomics, performance, alertness, fatigue, or worker safety; consulting services in the field of ergonomics and worker safety via computer-based systems for monitoring workplace activity, namely designing workplace facilities and and equipment to optomize efficiency and safety; consulting services in the design and implementation of computer-based information systems for optimizing work schedules and logistics planning; software as a service, namely, provision of software and associated hardware for monitoring workers and evaluating their physical activity and safety; consulting services in the field of worker safety, namely, evaluating, monitoring or assessing worker safety in industrial environments | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |