USPTO serial 86855235
I-CAN IPSEN COMPREHENSIVE CARE APPROACHFOR PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM SPASTIC PARESIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANOR, THOMAS M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I-CAN IPSEN COMPREHENSIVE CARE APPROACHFOR PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM SPASTIC PARESIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G MATHEW LOMBARD
G MATHEW LOMBARD LOMBARD & GELIEBTER LLP305 BROADWAY7 FLNEW YORK, NY 10007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education, namely, providing congresses and workshops in the fields of healthcare, disease diagnosis, disease treatment and medical procedures; providing of training services in the field of healthcare, disease diagnosis, disease treatment, medical procedures coaching services in the fields of healthcare, disease diagnosis, disease treatment and medical procedures; physical education; practical training in the fields of healthcare, disease diagnosis, disease treatment and medical procedures; arranging and conducting of colloquiums, conferences, workshops, seminars, symposiums in the fields of healthcare, disease diagnosis, disease treatment and medical procedures; publication of texts, other than publicity texts in the fields of healthcare, disease diagnosis, disease treatment and medical procedures | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services; health counseling; medical advice for the treatment of individuals with disabilities; physiotherapy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ipsen Biopharm Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named I-CAN IPSEN COMPREHENSIVE CARE APPROACHFOR PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM SPASTIC PARESIS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |