USPTO serial 86855405
PEACETECH LAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6037344Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 21, 2020
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PEACETECH LAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, DC, US
Washington, DC, US
Washington, DC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie N. Nafziger
Jamie N. Nafziger DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing Temporary Use of On-line Non-downloadable Software for Collecting, Editing, Organizing, Modifying, Book Marking, Transmitting, Storing and Sharing Data and Information in the Fields of Peacebuilding, Technology, Media, and Peacebuilding Statistics; Computer Software Consulting; Computer Software Design; Computer Software Development; Charitable Services, Namely, Providing Computer Software for Those in Need; Computer Hardware and Software Design; Computer Programming; Computer Project Management Services; Computer Services, Namely, Creating an On-line Community for Registered Users to Participate in Discussions, Get Feedback from their Peers, Form Virtual Communities, and Engage in Social Networking Services in the Field of Peacebuilding; Computer Software Development in the Field of Peacebuilding; Consulting Services in the Field of Providing Online, Non-downloadable Software and Applications; Consulting Services in the Field of Software as a Service (SAAS); Creating an On-line Community for Those Using Technology for Peacebuilding; Data Automation and Collection Service Using Proprietary Software to Evaluate, Analyze and Collect Service Data; Data Conversion of Electronic Information; Data Mining; Data Warehousing; Computer Compatibility Services, Namely, Data Mapping; Data Conversion, Namely, Data Conversion of Electronic Information; Electronic Storage of Electronic Media, Namely, Images, Text and Audio Data; Electronic Storage Services for Archiving Databases, Images and Other Electronic Data; Remote Online Backup of Computer Data; Database Design and Development; Database Development Services; Design and Development of Computer Hardware; Design and Development of Software and Hardware for Peacebuilding; Off-site Data Backup; Platform as a Service (PAAS) Featuring Computer Software Platforms for Collecting, Editing, Organizing, Modifying, Book Marking, Transmitting, Storing and Sharing Data, Images, Text, Audio, Video, and Information in the Fields of Peacebuilding, Technology, Media, and Peacebuilding Statistics; Providing Information in the Fields of Technology and Software Development Via an On-line Website; Providing Information on Computer Technology and Programming Via a Web Site; Providing Technology Consulting in the Field of Social Media; Rental of Application Software; Rental of Computer Hardware and Computer Software; Rental of Web Servers; Research and Development of Technology in the Fields of Peacebuilding and Technology; Consulting in the Fields of Peacebuilding Information Technology; Software Development in the Field of Peacebuilding; Testing, Analysis and Evaluation of the Services of Others to Determine Conformity with Certification Standards; Think Tank Services, Namely, Providing New Ideas and Concepts for Web-based Applications for Others; Think Tank Services in the Nature of Consultation Services in the Field of Information Technology Used for Peacebuilding; Think Tank Services, Namely, Software and Hardware Development and Engineering in the Fields of Peacebuilding, Technology, Media, and Peacebuilding Statistics; Think tank services, namely, providing new ideas, concepts, and consultation services on engineering for technology and science purposes in the fields of peacebuilding and technology; Providing an Online Interactive Database Featuring Information about Information Technology Used in the Field of Peacebuilding | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 13, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 17, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |