USPTO serial 86855707
NUMINTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNABB, SANDRA MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUMINTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. GLENNON TROUBLEFIELD
G. GLENNON TROUBLEFIELD CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO5 BECKER FARM ROADROSELAND, NJ 07068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Fragrances and scented ingredients, namely, oral care product flavorings and scented ingredients, namely, mint and orange non-essential scented oils, for general manufacturing purposes to enhance the smell, taste or aroma of end products; all of the foregoing containing a malodor counteractant created from ingredients for use in flavors and fragrances that is either a natural or synthetic blended flavor or fragrance in its final form | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | Fragrances and scented ingredients, namely, fragrances, oral care product flavorings and scented ingredients, namely, mint and orange essential oils, for general manufacturing purposes to enhance the smell, taste or aroma of end products; all of the foregoing containing a malodor counteractant created from ingredients for use in flavors and fragrances that is either a natural or synthetic blended flavor or fragrance in its final form | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2017 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |