Drawing for VERTEX TAX PERFORMANCE ENGINE

USPTO serial 86855764

VERTEX TAX PERFORMANCE ENGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
QUEEN, ESTHER FELICIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERTEX TAX PERFORMANCE ENGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN &50 SOUTH 16TH STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-2516UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and instructional manuals sold as a unit to assist businesses in tax planning assessment and complianceACTIVE—
016Books, manuals and pamphlets all featuring tax research, assessment and compliance information and tax preparation and filing toolsACTIVE—
035Providing and disseminating business information in the fields of tax, tax research and tax filings all directed to assisting others in tax complianceACTIVE—
041Development and dissemination of printed educational materials in the fields of tax, tax research and tax filings, all directed to assisting others in tax complianceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 12, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance