Drawing for WOODSTOCK

USPTO serial 86855892

WOODSTOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WOODSTOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.

JONATHAN D REICHMAN HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP200 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Food supplements containing cannabidiol; supplements in the nature of dietary supplements containing containing cannabidiol (CBD) from plant oilsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 2, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 2, 2020MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jan 2, 2020ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Nov 25, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 26, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2019PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
Jun 14, 2019MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2019RGTTREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Jun 12, 2019APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 18, 2019TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2019ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2018ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jun 21, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 13, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 13, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 13, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 13, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 24, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2016TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jan 20, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance