Drawing for DMI DRIVING MOBILE INNOVATION

USPTO serial 86857282

DMI DRIVING MOBILE INNOVATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DMI DRIVING MOBILE INNOVATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy H. Lutz

NANCY H. LUTZ MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.P.O. BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software that provides web-based access to services through a web operating system or portal interfaceACTIVE—
035Business data analysis; business intelligence services; business consulting and management services in the field of operational technology; government consulting and management services in the field of government contracts for the purchase of goods and services relating to operational technologyACTIVE—
042Computer software development; application service provider, namely, developing, managing, and maintaining information technology (IT) systems; IT consulting services relating to mobile device management; information technology consulting; technical support services, namely, installation, administration and management of web and database applications and software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of issues relating to web and database applications and software; technical support services, namely, administration and management of public and private cloud computing information technology systems and application systems; remote monitoring of others' computer networks and mobile devices to support business management to ensure proper functioningACTIVE—
045Remote monitoring of others' computer networks and mobile devices to detect suspicious activity for security purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 9, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 18, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 18, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 18, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance