Drawing for COOKINPELLETS.COM

USPTO serial 86858003

COOKINPELLETS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HISER, CHARLES
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COOKINPELLETS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Processed wood fuel in the nature of pellets for use in barbecue grillsACTIVESep 1, 2007
009Downloadable mobile applications for advertising barbecue grill fuelsACTIVEMar 1, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 23, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 23, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 8, 2021EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Sep 23, 2020CTDRCT DECISION: REVERSED AND REMANDED—
Aug 17, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 24, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 23, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 30, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2017CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 19, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 19, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 19, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 22, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 16, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2016CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Apr 14, 2016EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Apr 14, 2016CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance