Drawing for MEREDITH

USPTO serial 86858086

MEREDITH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MEREDITH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kao H. Lu

Kao. H Lu/Chun-Ming ShihP.O. BOX 230970Centreville, VA 20120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Babies' diaper-pants; Babies' diapers; Breast-nursing pads; Depuratives for the body; Diapers for incontinents; Diapers for pets; Food for babies; Pants, absorbent, for incontinents; Protein dietary supplements; Medicated compressesACTIVEJun 23, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 18, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 20, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 19, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 13, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 31, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 31, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 27, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 18, 2016ISERWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Apr 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance