Drawing for LE LEAUTOLINK

USPTO serial 86858204

LE LEAUTOLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SIRIGNANO, EMMA MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE LEAUTOLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Anna McCoy

B. Anna McCoy McCoy Russell LLP806 SW BroadwaySuite 600Portland, OR 97205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Air transportation; Boat rental; Car transport; Chauffeur services; Escorting of travellers; Freight transportation by car, truck, train, air; GPS navigation services; Motor coach rental; Postal, freight and courier services; Railway coach rental; Rental and leasing of ships; Rental of warehouses; Transportation of goods; Rental of electric cars; Rental of GPS-equipped vehicles, namely, scooters, electric cars and bicycles; Rental of vehicles used as displays at events; Transportation and delivery services by air, road, rail and sea; Rental of warehouse spaceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 24, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 24, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 24, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 18, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 23, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 19, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 19, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2016MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance