USPTO serial 86858371
DAKKS DEUTSCHE AKKREDITIERUNGSSTELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GALAN, MATTHEW
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAKKS DEUTSCHE AKKREDITIERUNGSSTELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea L. Calvaruso
ANDREA L. CALVARUSO KELLEY DRYE & WARREN, LLP101 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical and clinical examinations, especially medical laboratory diagnostics, gene diagnosis, and pathology for diagnostic or treatment purposes; blood bank services, pharmacy services, blood-donation services, medical services by doctors, hospitals, veterinary services, medical clinics and medical clinic services including care of persons, and teledoctor services, namely, provision of health care and medical services by health care professionals via telecommunication networks; preparation of medical expertise, namely, medical consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Deutsche Akkreditierungsstelle GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Deutsche Akkreditierungsstelle GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named DAKKS DEUTSCHE AKKREDITIERUNGSSTELLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |