Drawing for ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL

USPTO serial 86858708

ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5207312Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 23, 2017
Examiner
MCPHERSON RAYBURN, SHAVELL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with ECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert C. Lukes

Robert C. Lukes GARLINGTON, LOHN & ROBINSON, PLLP350 RYMAN ST., PO BOX 7909MISSOULA, MT 59807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of environmental science; Educational services, namely, developing curriculum for others in the field of environmental science; Educational services, namely, providing internships and exchange programs in the fields of environmental science; Leadership development training in the field of environmental science; Conducting guided tours of environmentally sensative regions; Leadership development training for educatorsACTIVESep 1, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2023NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2023C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 29, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 29, 2023E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 23, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 29, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 6, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance