USPTO serial 86858900
INTERROLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2018
- Examiner
- KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with INTERROLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sant' Antonino, CH
Sant' Antonino, CH
Sant' Antonino, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald E. Hespos
Gerald E. Hespos HESPOS & PORCO, LLP20 Oldchester RoadEssex Fells, NJ 07021United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal construction materials, namely, columns, beams, and diagonal support braces; transportable constructions and construction elements for conveyor systems, transport systems, sorter systems, storage systems, flow racks, order picking and commissioning systems, namely, metal rollers, specially design metal racks*;* [ , containers of metal for transport; ] metal racks; [ metal housings, ] sheets and guards, namely, metal guard barriers for conveyor systems, transport systems, sorter systems, storage systems, flow racks, order picking and commissioning systems for controlling movement of objects along system and preventing injury to hands and fingers of workers caused by moving objects; [ metal sliding doors and drawers; metal rails; metal guard rails and roller rails; metal frameworks; metal plates; metal floors; ] metal chutes not being parts of machines for moving goods, flow racks, and order picking [ ; metal storage containers and pallets, namely, conveyor pallets and warehouse pallets; metal bolts; metal screws; metal nuts; shaped parts of metal for fastening purposes, namely, threaded parts, screw terminals and clamps, screw caps, threaded rings, spring clips, connecting sleeves for covering bolts, clamps, clips and latching bodies ] | ACTIVE | Apr 4, 2016 |
| 009 | Measuring, testing, signaling and checking apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic control systems for flow racks, order picking and commissioning installations, flow rack installations, and material flow installations; [ sensors and detectors, namely, for the detection and identification of transported material; ] electronic and electric control apparatus and control instruments, namely, electric and electronic controls for belt and roller conveyor machines, commissioning installations, flow rack installations, and material flow installations; control modules for controlling drives and motors; [ computer hardware; ] software for controlling industrial processes in belt and roller conveyor machines, commissioning installations, flow rack installations, and material flow installations [ ; radiofrequency identification tags; cables and cable conduits, namely, for the transmission of data, data synchronization, signal transmission and for electric and electronic purposes ] | ACTIVE | Apr 4, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Interroll Holding AG
- Other trademarks owned by Interroll Holding AG
- Other trademarks owned by Interroll Holding AG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INTERROLL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - CERTIFICATE OF REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |