USPTO serial 86859292
ALPHADOLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTONE, KERI H
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALPHADOLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur Aaronson
ARTHUR AARONSON AARONSON & AARONSON16133 VENTURA BLVD., SUITE 675ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamins; Dietary supplements; Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary supplemental drinks in the nature of vitamin and mineral beverages; Mineral supplements; Nutritional supplements; Vitamin supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |