USPTO serial 86859697
SIRBUTLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIRBUTLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing commercial directory information online; providing trade, telephone directory, consumer product information and business, local service provider, shopping, product, doctor, medical, attorney and other professional and business referrals via global computer network; providing consumer product and services information and order fulfillment services in response from to customer requests; advertising and business management consultancy; on-line auction services; rental of advertising space; Mediation of advertising for others; Retail store services featuring consumer products and home services, as well as business and professional services; computerized on-line gift ordering service which matches the gift giver's requirements with the gift recipient's wants and needs; pre-paid gift card services, namely, advertising services in the nature of promoting the pre-paid gift cards of others, promoting the goods of others by means of providing online pre-paid gift cards; providing an on-line commercial information directory on the internet; Client acquisition services, namely, acquisition and merger consultation, business acquisitions consultation; Providing an online website for client acquisition featuring information in the field of acquisition and merger consultation, business acquisitions consultation and acquisition of service contracts and purchase orders; advertising on the Internet for others; computerized online ordering services in the field of consumer and business goods and services; Promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website featuring coupons, gift certificates, gift cards, business-to-business trade, and electronic advertising offers; promotional services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; operation of a website containing coupons, gift certificates, gift cards, business-to-business trade, and electronic advertising offers, and business to consumer offers, Promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website featuring coupons, rebates, price-comparison information, product reviews, links to the retail websites of others, and discount information; Advertising and marketing services in the field of the wares and services of third parties; mediation of trade business for third parties; bidding quotation; job and personnel placement; coupon, consumer and business goods and services procurement services; advertising services; providing a searchable online advertising guide featuring the goods and services of other on-line vendors on the internet; Providing telephone and online business directory information online; group buying services, namely, buying club services, wholesale buying club services | ACTIVE | Oct 8, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| May 29, 2017 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |