USPTO serial 86859896
SUNER POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNER POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shenzhen, CN
Shenzhen, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason R. Lee
JASON R LEE THE TRADEMARK FIRM PLLC2370 W SR 89A SUITE 11-225SEDONA, AZ 86336UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Batteries and battery chargers; Batteries and battery chargers for intravenous fluid delivery apparatus; Battery chargers; Battery chargers for use with telephones; Converters; Converters, electric; Inverters; Solar panels for production of electricity; Solar panels for the production of electricity; Cell phone battery chargers; Photovoltaic inverters; Power inverters; Power supply connectors and adaptors for use with portable electronic devices; Thin-film solar (TFS), vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT) and Hybrid TFS VAWT off-grid power and deep cycle battery storage systems composed of batteries, charge controllers and inverters with integrated LED bulbs and LED light fixtures | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |