USPTO serial 86859900
HOLY COW! KOSHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, LAUREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOLY COW! KOSHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua A. Schaul
JOSHUA A SCHAUL SHERMAN IP LLP1519 26TH STREETSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Substitute bacon; substitute bacon bits; beef; beef jerky; beef patties; substitute charcuterie; chicken; chicken stock; substitute ham; substitute head cheese; hot dogs; beef kielbasa, turkey kielbasa, chicken kielbasa; beef, veal, turkey, chicken knockwurst; liver; liver paste; liver paté; substitute mortadella; substitute pancetta; substitute prosciutto; beef and lamb ribs; salami; beef or chicken-based sausage meat; sausages; turkey; turkey burger patties; turkey sausages; veal; veal stock; substitute braunschweiger; corned beef; corned beef hash; dried beef; frozen chicken, namely, breast; frozen chicken, namely, leg quarters; meat-based snack foods; poultry, namely, chicken; poultry, namely, turkey; poultry, namely, duck; poultry, namely, goose; preserved meats and sausages; processed lamb; processed meat, namely, beef; processed meat, namely, turkey; processed meat, namely, duck; processed meat, namely, veal; processed meat, namely, lamb; processed meat, namely, elk; processed meat, namely, chicken; processed meat, namely, bison; roast beef; smoked sausages; turkey sausages; uncooked sausages; all of the foregoing is certified Kosher | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |