Drawing for MILK STREET KITCHEN

USPTO serial 86859994

MILK STREET KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MILK STREET KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathleen E. Stadecker

CATHLEEN E. STADECKER DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STREET, P.O. BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital media, namely, DVDs, downloadable video recordings, and downloadable electronic publications, namely, books, magazines, newsletters and instructional material in the field of food and cooking; downloadable electronic data files featuring recipes; downloadable television and radio programs in the field of food and cooking provided via a video-on demand service; downloadable mobile applications for viewing and interacting with electronic publications in the field of food and cookingACTIVE—
016Printed publications, namely, books, magazines, newsletters and instructional material in the field of food and cookingACTIVE—
021Cookware, namely, pots, pans, roasters, steamers, saucepans, skillets, stockpots, broilers, pot covers, baking dishes, bakeware, cooking tools, cooking gadgets, and cooking appliancesACTIVE—
035Retail store and online retail store services featuring cookwareACTIVE—
041Cooking instruction; educational services, namely, providing online and live classes, seminars, workshops and conferences in the field of food and cooking and distributing material in connection therewith; providing online publications in the nature of articles, e-books, blogs and newsletters in the field of food and cooking; entertainment in the nature of live stage presentations in the field of food and cooking; organizing events, namely, cooking competitions, recipe contests and taste tests; entertainment in the nature of ongoing television and radio programs in the field of food and cooking; providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of food, cooking recipes and cookwareACTIVE—
043Providing a website featuring information in the fields of cooking, recipes, food and cookwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 5, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance