USPTO serial 86860347
SAINT MARC CHEESE AFFINAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAHILL, CLARE GALLAGHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAINT MARC CHEESE AFFINAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Okayama-shi, Okayama, JP
Okayama-shi, Okayama, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Joseph Trojan
R. JOSEPH TROJAN TROJAN LAW OFFICES9250 WILSHIRE BLVD., STE 325BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; rice; tapioca and sago; flour; preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal bars, biscuits, tarts, cakes made with cereals; bread, pastry; confectionery, namely, confectionery made of sugar, frozen confectionery; ices; sugar, honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar, sauces in the nature of condiments; spices; coffee products, namely, coffee extracts, iced coffee, instant coffee; coffee beans; ground coffee beans; instant coffee; unroasted coffee; coffee-based beverages; coffee beverages with milk; coffee flavorings, other than essential oils, for beverages; tea-based beverages; cocoa products, namely, cocoa powder, cocoa mixes; cocoa-based beverages; cocoa beverages with milk; chocolate; chocolate-based beverages; chocolate beverages with milk; chocolate fillings for bakery products; bread rolls; buns; filled bread products, namely, bread sticks and fruit breads filled with meat and cream cheese; bread rolls filled with meat and cream cheese; buns filled with meat and cream cheese; cakes; waffles; ice cream; dressings for salad; edible ices; frozen yogurt in the nature of confectionery ices; fruit jellies confectionery, namely, fruit jelly cake; pies; pizzas; pastas; sandwiches; sherbets in the nature of confectionery ices; natural sweeteners; hamburger sandwiches; hot dog sandwiches; biscuits | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2015 |
| 043 | Providing food and drink; coffee shop services; cafe restaurants; cafes; cafeterias; canteen services; snack-bars; restaurants; self-service restaurant services; bakery restaurants; food and drink catering | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Saint Marc Holdings Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Saint Marc Holdings Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named SAINT MARC CHEESE AFFINAGE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |