Drawing for AUDIOGLASS

USPTO serial 86860788

AUDIOGLASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUDIOGLASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John L. DuPre'

JOHN L. DUPRE' HAMILTON, BROOK, SMITH & REYNOLDS, P.C.530 VIRGINIA ROAD, P.O. BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Smart eyeglasses capable of receiving voice input such as command, control or conversation for a phone call and delivering sound output to ear such as a phone call, information, or music; Smart sunglasses capable of receiving voice input such as command, control or conversation for a phone call and delivering sound output to ear such as phone call, information, or musicABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2016MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2016ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 2016EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2016ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance