Drawing for ASICS TIGER

USPTO serial 86861056

ASICS TIGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLACK, MILDRED ELIZABETH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ASICS TIGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn Scanlon Hernandez

LYNN SCANLON HERNANDEZ ASICS CORPORATION80 TECHNOLOGY DRIVEIRVINE, CA 92618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear; Clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, shirts, pants, shorts, jackets, socks; headgear, namely, hats and capsACTIVEJun 19, 2017

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 20, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2018CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2018SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 19, 2018IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 19, 2018EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 1, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 31, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 24, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance