USPTO serial 86861422
PADSENS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2021
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PADSENS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CENTRAL, HK
Wanchai, HK
Wanchai, HK
WANCHAI, HK
CENTRAL, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc David Freed
Marc David Freed THE FREED LAW FIRM422 VISTA DEL MAR DRIVEAPTOS, CA 95003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Disposable incontinence pad with an embedded printed conductive ink comb pattern connected to a moisture detection sensor | ACTIVE | Aug 2, 2019 |
| 010 | A medical device consisting of a moisture detection sensor connected to disposable incontinence bed pads with an embedded printed conductive ink comb pattern or an embedded conductive thread, for use in treatment and management of incontinence; disposable incontinence bed pad with an embedded printed conductive ink comb pattern or embedded conductive thread connected to a moisture detection sensor | ACTIVE | Aug 2, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONVERGENT SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Convergence Systems Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Convergence Systems Limited
- Other trademarks owned by CER LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CONVERGENT SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named PADSENS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2021 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2020 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 1, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |