USPTO serial 86861938
UPSYTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOY, JOSHUA SPENCER JOLL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UPSYTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harris A. Wolin
HARRIS A. WOLIN GRAHAM CURTIN, P.A.P.O. BOX 19914 HEADQUARTERS PLAZAMORRISTOWN, NJ 07962-1991Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing a website that gives users the ability to utilize or customize pre-built or custom templates to create their own websites and user experiences; Providing a website and/or marketplace that allows users to obtain and/or purchase pre-built or custom templates to create their own websites and user experiences; Providing integrated e-commerce solutions and/or services for social media platforms and/or websites that aggregate user content; Computer software development in the field of templating languages; Providing a website or software as a service (SAAS) that provides non-interactive or interactive tools, utilities, code generators, templating language generators, samples, and technical documentation related to templating languages; Providing a central repository and/or marketplace for templating language code; Computer software development in the field of website development, hosting and integrated application programs; Designing, creating, maintaining, and hosting websites for others; Software as a service (SAAS) related to the collection, aggregation, integration, and exchange of data and content between a host platform and other network-connected software, websites or applications; Software as a service (SAAS) related to the configuration of website templates; Software as a service (SAAS) related to conducting E-commerce including business management, order processing, customer relationships, analytics, fulfillment, inventory, online chat, finances, and shipping; Developing and hosting one or more servers on a global computer network for the purpose of facilitating e-commerce; E-commerce services such as accepting and/or facilitating payments; An e-commerce software as a service (SAAS) solution based on any of the above; a mobile software application or a downloadable or non-downloadable software solution related to the above | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |