USPTO serial 86861989
MISS MONEYPENNY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MISS MONEYPENNY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc Phillip Bodner
1175 East 27th StreetBROOKLYN, NY 11210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software to deliver loyalty, marketing, and engagement; software using artificial intelligence to provide real-time customer and transactional data to retailers for customer profiling and personalized marketing; Software to find suitable services for other people; Software to find suitable products for other people; Software which improves and develops itself by using; Software for calendar and reminder functions; Software for relationship management and relationship maintenance | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing access to a worldwide computer network; Providing access of search engines for Internet; Providing access of Online-Forums; Transmission of greeting cards using the Internet; Procure access for databases; all the foregoing excluding voice and data transmission and reception services via telecommunication means | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Updating of computer software; Consultation on the design of Websites; Computer software consulting; Computer system analysis; Design of computer software; Design of computer systems; Creating programmes for data processing; Design and support of Websites for third parties; Installation of computer programmes; Converting of computer programmes and data; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software to deliver loyalty, marketing, and engagement; Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence to provide real-time customer and transactional data to retailers for customer profiling and personalized marketing; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software to deliver, display, create and customize products and services for the insurance and financial services industry for processing, inventory management and accounting of financial services documents, data and contracts, data migration services as well as advisory and consulting services related to insurance products and their quality assurance and quality control; Rental of computer software; Maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bojic Anna
- Other trademarks owned by Lampe Marc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MISS MONEYPENNY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |