USPTO serial 86862139
EMBEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 24, 2020
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with EMBEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Freiburg, DE
Freiburg, DE
Freiburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Alexander Nolte
N. Alexander Nolte Nolte Lackenbach Siegel111 Brook Street, Suite 101SCARSDALE, NY 10583United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Maintenance of electrical circuits, integrated circuits, computer hardware [, electrical and electronic avionics equipment, medical apparatus and equipment, telecommunication machines and apparatus, safety equipment in the nature of avionic equipment, railway equipment, process automation equipment, industrial automation equipment, medical engineering automation equipment, and safety automation equipment, automation equipment in the nature of avionic control systems, railway control systems, process and industrial systems, and medical engineering systems, measuring and regulating equipment in the nature of motion sensors, measuring sensors and equipment, motion activation sensors, ] and computer interface boards | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2019 |
| 042 | Technical consulting in the technology field of computer hardware systems and electrical components thereof in the context of safety-related systems avionic automation, railway automation, process automation, industrial automation, medical engineering automation, and safety automation; design, development, and testing services for others in the field of electrical circuits, embedded computer hardware and software, [ electrical and electronic avionics equipment, medical apparatus and equipment, telecommunication machines and apparatus, safety equipment in the nature of motion sensors, measuring sensors, motion activation sensors, automation equipment in the nature of motion and control elements for use in avionics, railway, medical, and safety automation, measuring and regulating equipment in the nature of motion sensors, measuring sensors and equipment, motion activation sensors, and electronic interfaces; ] maintenance of embedded computer software, analysis of computer hardware and software systems for others; engineering services, namely, technical planning for computer hardware and software systems in the field of safety- and non-safety applications; engineering services, namely, technical computer project management for computer hardware and software systems in the field of safety- and non-safety applications; engineering services, namely, engineering for functional safety related systems for the automation industry; testing, analysis and evaluation of functional safety related systems for the automation industry | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 1, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 6, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |