CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EMENUS

USPTO serial 86862221

EMENUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMENUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph W. Bain

JOSEPH W BAIN SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP525 OKEECHOBEE BLVD1100 CITYPLACE TOWERWEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for data base management by hotels around the world to enable their clients and guests to see online menus and photos of meals to orderACTIVEDec 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2019MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 15, 2019ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 13, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 13, 2019EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Nov 20, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 16, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 17, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 11, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 11, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 9, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 9, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 25, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 4, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance