CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SWAGTRON

USPTO serial 86862891

SWAGTRON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWAGTRON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lydia M. Lim

525 Parriott PlaceCity of Industry, CA 91745UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, shirts, hats, headwear, jackets, coats, pants, shoes and footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 21, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Oct 20, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 15, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 15, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2016NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 5, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 4, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 4, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2016TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jan 6, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance