Drawing for MAXSWIVEL

USPTO serial 86863036

MAXSWIVEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXSWIVEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy T. Wang

TIMOTHY T. WANG NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC8140 WALNUT HILL LN., STE. 500DALLAS, TX 75231UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Vacuum cleaners; Electric kitchen machines, namely, electric mixers; Washing machines, namely, laundry washing machines; Dishwashers; Household bean juice maker, namely, electric juicer; Household bean juice machines, namely, machines for extracting juice from beans; Electric compressors; Compressed air machines; Wringing machines for laundry; Electric fruit presses for household purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 20, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 15, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance