Drawing for BODY CODE SYSTEM

USPTO serial 86863331

BODY CODE SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEDMAN, CORI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BODY CODE SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik M. Pelton

ERIK M PELTON ERIK M PELTON & ASSOCIATES PLLCPO BOX 100637ARLINGTON, VA 22210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio and video downloads providing information, coaching, and training in the fields of emotional wellness, personal lifestyle and relationships, emotional and mental health, energy healingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 2, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 8, 2017RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 22, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 5, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 4, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 4, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 14, 2017RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Feb 14, 2017RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Feb 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 4, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance