USPTO serial 86864156
LEFUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEFUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Anna McCoy
B. Anna McCoy McCoy Russell LLP806 SW BroadwaySuite 600Portland, OR 97205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Authenticating works of art; Cloud computing featuring software for use in the field of sports, movie, music, data management, film, education and electric storage of data, namely, software for watching sports games, watching movie, listing to music, running data management, creating film, and running electric storage of data; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Computer services, namely, integration of private and public cloud computing environments; Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; Computer software design; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Design of interior decor; Dress designing; Electronic data storage; Industrial design; Providing meteorological information; Providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Rental of computer software; Rental of computer software and programs; Rental of computer software; Rental of computer software and programs; Rental of computers; Scientific research and development; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for game, education, e-commerce, online retail, image processing, sound processing, video processing, data processing, music, movie, entertainment, computer program management, app management, sports, film, database management and use in electronic storage of data, namely, software for playing game, conducting e-commerce, conducting online retail, running image processing, running sound processing, running video processing, running data processing, listening to music, watching movie, running computer program management, running app management, watching sports games, creating film, running database management and running electronic storage of data; Application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and web sites, in the fields of personal productivity, wireless communication, mobile information access, and remote data management for wireless delivery of content to handheld computers, laptops and mobile electronic devices; Computer security services, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials; Computer services, namely, hosting an interactive web site that allows users to upload, store and maintain automotive repair records, manage online records of services performed on their vehicles, and receive automated service reminders, safety alerts, recall alerts, and special discount offers; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Off-site data backup; Research services in the field of information and telecommunications technology; Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |