USPTO serial 86864333
V VIGILENT INC. ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCESOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 20, 2021
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with V VIGILENT INC. ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCESOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $975
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Charleston, SC, US
Vienna, VA, US
Vienna, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven D. Lustig
Steven D. Lustig Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP2001 Market StreetSuite 2800Pittsburgh, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Training services in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security, traffic management, and operation of unmanned aerial systems; providing training in the nature of simulations in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security and operation of unmanned aerial systems; developing training systems and training simulations for others in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security, traffic management, and operation of unmanned aerial systems; training drone operators in the fields of oil and gas, agriculture, civil engineering and infrastructure | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2012 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software featuring training and simulations in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security and operation of unmanned aerial systems; Design and development of computer hardware, computer software, computer systems, and information technology systems for use in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security, traffic management, operation of unmanned aerial systems; computer software integration services; technological consultation, namely, computer technology consulting for others in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security, traffic management, and operation of unmanned aerial systems; installation of computer software for others in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security, traffic management, and operation of unmanned aerial systems; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security, traffic management, and operation of unmanned aerial systems; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for training and simulations in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security, traffic management, and operation of unmanned aerial systems | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2012 |
| 045 | Security consulting services in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security, traffic management, operation of unmanned aerial systems; security consulting, namely, security threat analysis in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security and operation of unmanned aerial systems; security consulting, namely, security threat analysis in the fields of chemical and biological threats; security consulting, namely, providing security assessments for businesses and governmental agencies; security consulting, namely, consulting services in the fields of security analysis and threat assessment; consulting services in the field of supporting training programs offered by others in the fields of national defense, civil defense, homeland security, counter-terrorism, emergency response, maritime security, traffic management, operation of unmanned aerial systems | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vigilent Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vigilent Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vigilent Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named V VIGILENT INC. ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCESOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2021 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2020 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |