USPTO serial 86864784
NETDEFEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5387234Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2018
- Examiner
- DENNIS, SETH OWEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NETDEFEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Information technology management services, namely, the operation and administration of telecommunication systems and networks for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 25, 2016 |
| 042 | Information technology services in the field of computer network security, namely, monitoring and detecting of computer network security threats comprising application attacks, malware, brute force attacks, suspicious network activity and security vulnerabilities for the purpose of ensuring proper functioning of the computer networks; Information technology services in the field of computer network security, namely, preventing computer network security threats by scanning, detecting, quarantining and eliminating malware and unauthorized data on computer networks; Information technology services in the field of computer network security, namely, preventing computer network security threats by restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Information technology services in the field of computer network security, namely, preventing computer network security threats by updating of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; information technology services in the field of computer network compliance management, namely, monitoring and reporting of computer network security threats to assure compliance with industry standards; information technology services in the field of computer network security, namely, the detection, analyzing, and preventing of computer security threats by and through scanning and testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; information technology services in the field of data security, namely, providing computer security service through scanning, detecting, quarantining and eliminating of malware and unauthorized data and programs on computers and electronic devices; information technology services in the field of data security, namely, data encryption services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 25, 2016 |
| 045 | Computer security services involving threat detection, analysis, and prevention services, namely, computer security threat analysis for the protection of personal property; information technology services in the field of data security, namely, tracking, monitoring and logging abnormal or suspicious events for security purposes; information technology services in the field of data security, namely, monitoring of computer data files for security purposes; information technology services in the field of data security, namely, administration of digital keys; Information technology services in the field of computer network security, namely, electronically monitoring and detecting of application attacks, malware, brute force attacks, suspicious activity and vulnerabilities on computer networks for security purposes and to prevent theft, fraud, or other criminal activity | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 25, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Netelligent Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Netelligent Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Netelligent Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named NETDEFEND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 12, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 8, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |