USPTO serial 86865155
BLING MACHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLING MACHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, HK
Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tammy L. Browning-Smith
TAMMY L. BROWNING-SMITH BROWNING-SMITH PC752 N MAIN ST #260WESTERVILLE, OH 43082UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal brads; Metal rivets | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewellery boxes; Jewellery findings; Jewellery, including imitation jewellery and plastic jewellery; Jewelry and imitation jewelry; Jewelry for attachment to clothing; Jewelry making kits; Rhinestones for making jewelry; Beads for making jewelry; Rhinestones for making jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Craft glue for stationery or household purposes; Glitter glue for stationery purposes; Stationery; Children's arts and crafts paper kits | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Rhinestones other than for making jewelry; Ribbons; Beads, other than for making jewellery; Beads, other than for making jewelry; Press studs; Rhinestones other than for making jewelry; Snap fasteners | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toy jewelry; Cases for children's multiple activity toys; Hobby craft sets for attaching rhinestone embellishments to clothing and jewelry; Novelty toy items in the nature of puzzles and card games to develop creativity of kids by provided components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Red Star Holdings Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Red Star Holdings Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BLING MACHINE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 18, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |