USPTO serial 86865484
KERRY HOTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PATEL, SAMIR RAMESH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KERRY HOTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD RICHARD LAW GROUP8411 PRESTON ROADSUITE 890DALLAS, TX 75225Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting of conferences; arranging and conducting of seminars; health club services, namely, providing health and fitness training; holiday camp services; party planning; providing amusement arcade services; providing karaoke services; providing sports facilities; publication of books; provision of recreational facilities; recreation information; rental of sports equipment, except vehicles; rental of sports grounds; rental of tennis courts; sport camp services; ticket agency services for entertainment events | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Hotels; apartment and condominium services; resort hotel services; Making hotel reservations for others; bar, cafe, cafeteria, snack bar, coffee-shop, restaurant and catering services; hotel lounge services; banqueting services; providing facilities for conference and exhibitions; booking agency services for hotel accommodation; arranging and providing temporary accommodations; reservation and rental of temporary accommodations; catering services; preparation of food and beverages; self-service and fast food restaurants; rental of rooms for social functions; providing information relating to hotel services on-line from a computer database or via the Internet or extranets; providing information relating to preparation of food and beverages and catering services on-line from a computer database or via the Internet or extranets; providing information relating to restaurants and bars services on-line from a computer database or via the Internet or extranets | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Spa services; flower arranging services; provision of sauna, solarium and sun deck facilities; beauty salon services; skin care beauty treatment services; hairdressing services; massage services; massage services; pedicure and manicure services; provision of information and advisory relating to the use of skin, beauty treatment and cosmetic products; depilatory waxing; providing information relating to beauty and hair salon services on-line from a computer database or via the Internet or extranets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |