Drawing for DEFINING THE WAY HEALTHCARE SHOULD BE

USPTO serial 86866380

DEFINING THE WAY HEALTHCARE SHOULD BE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARKS, KIMBERLY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEFINING THE WAY HEALTHCARE SHOULD BE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie Gregory Ray

JULIE GREGORY RAY MIDDLETON REUTLINGER401 S. FOURTH STREETSUITE 2600LOUISVILLE, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Recruitment services, namely, personnel recruitment; Promoting awareness of the value of employee and physician engagement and alignment with enterprise objectives to increase productivity and performance consistent with a company's mission, culture and valuesACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing educational programs in the field of employee and physician productivity and performance consistent with a company's mission, culture and values to increase engagement and alignment with enterprise objectivesACTIVE—
044Healthcare services; medical servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2016ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 1, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance