Drawing for FINGRPRINT

USPTO serial 86866454

FINGRPRINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORAN, CAROLINE L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FINGRPRINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joshua M. Gerben,

JOSHUA M. GERBEN, Gerben Law Firm, PLLC1050 Connecticut Ave, NWSuite 500Washington, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software which allows users to edit photographs; Computer application software which allows users to share photographs across social networks; Computer application software which allows users to order print booklets of photographs taken by the userACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 27, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 30, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 27, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance