USPTO serial 86866973
PC DOES WHAAAT?!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PC DOES WHAAAT?!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SANTA CLARA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine M. Basile
KATHERINE M. BASILE REED SMITH LLPP.O. BOX 488REED SMITH DOCKETING DEPARTMENTPITTSBURGH, PA 15230Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS; LAPTOP COMPUTERS; MINICOMPUTERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSORS; MICROPROCESSORS; DATA PROCESSORS; CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS; COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2016 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2016 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2016 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |