Drawing for ALLCROFT

USPTO serial 86868050

ALLCROFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NITKIN, DINISHA F
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALLCROFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edgar A, Zarins

EDGAR A ZARINS Masco Corporation17450 College ParkwayLivonia, MI 48152UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Bathroom accessories, namely, towel bars, towel rings, tissue holders and toothbrush-tumbler holdersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 26, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 26, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 10, 2017EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 28, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2017GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2017GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2017CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 29, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 2, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 2, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 4, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance