USPTO serial 86868282
ROCKY MOUNTAIN LIFESTYLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROCKY MOUNTAIN LIFESTYLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EastCoast Lifestyle Clothing Inc.
Wolfville, Nova Scotia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James F. Keenan, Jr.
James F. Keenan, Jr. Bernstein Shur Sawyer & Nelson100 Middle StreetP.O. Box 9729Portland, ME 04104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Casual clothing, namely, T-shirts, hooded sweatshirts, jackets, pants, hats, shorts, tank tops, shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 7, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |