Drawing for NATURE'S BASKET BY GIANT EAGLE

USPTO serial 86868400

NATURE'S BASKET BY GIANT EAGLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COHEN, ROBERT ANDREW
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURE'S BASKET BY GIANT EAGLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David V. Radack

DAVID V. RADACK Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott Llc600 Grant St Fl 44Pittsburgh, PA 15219-2713UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Yogurt; Eggs; Luncheon meats; Canned vegetables; Potato chips; Olive oil; Applesauce; Soup; Canned tomatoes; Beef; Processed potatoes; Processed avocados; Dried fruitACTIVE—
030Pretzels; Corn chips; Cheese flavored snacks, namely, cheese curls; Pizza crust mixes; Cake mixes; Muffin mixes; Tea; Breakfast cereals; Granola; Salsa; Ketchup; Mustard; Pizza sauce; Frozen bread; Frozen desserts, namely, ice cream and frozen fruit barsACTIVE—
031Raw fruit; fresh fruit; unprocessed fruit; raw potatoes; unprocessed potatoes; raw avocados; unprocessed avocados; raw onions; unprocessed onions; and raw nutsACTIVE—
032Apple juiceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 20, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Mar 30, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 16, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 16, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 14, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 14, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance