USPTO serial 86868835
MONSTER NEGOTIATORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MONSTER NEGOTIATORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE PC901 NORTH GLEBE ROAD11TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Real estate marketing services, namely, marketing of residential and commercial properties for others | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Real estate services, namely, real estate agency services; real estate services, namely, real estate listing; providing real estate information and real estate listing information via the Internet; real estate investing; real estate services, namely, real estate brokerage services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |