Drawing for DATA QUALITY SCANNER

USPTO serial 86869868

DATA QUALITY SCANNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5130630Status 701Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2017
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 701: Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary.

Need help with DATA QUALITY SCANNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Lennon

James M. Lennon Devlin Law Firm LLC1526 Gilpin Ave.BridgeforceWilmington, DE 19806

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and firmware for verifying the accuracy of data received from consumer credit accounts for the purpose of furnishing more accurate consumer credit account data to credit reporting agencies in compliance with the credit reporting industry's adopted standard electronic data reporting formatsACTIVEJan 8, 2016
036Providing financial information services to lenders and other financial institutions to identify and remediate compliance gaps in consumer credit data furnishing with respect to rules, regulations or standards set by the Fair Credit Reporting Act and credit reporting agenciesACTIVEJan 8, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2023NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 20238.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Oct 17, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2023EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2023PRA8POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8—
Jul 14, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 24, 2023ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2022REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2017R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Dec 21, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2016CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance