USPTO serial 86870315
NAVIGATORSRVS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2018
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with NAVIGATORSRVS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
Rhett V. Barney Lee & Hayes, PC601 W RIVERSIDE, SUITE 1400SPOKANE, WA 99201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating and preparing business research reports from market information in the fields of office, retail, multi-tenant residential, and income producing real estate; Providing online, non-downloadable software for creating, accessing, updating, downloading, viewing and manipulating information in the fields of market research, leasing, finance, product tracking and competitor information, consumer demographics, product information, consumer information, and market segmentation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for market research and business research; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing assistance in development of business strategies; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating efficiency through the digitization of business processes; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating and preparing business research reports from market information in the fields of office, retail, multi-tenant residential, and income producing real estate; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for preparing business research reports from market information in the fields of investment portfolios; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for data modeling, pricing and planning in the real estate industry; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring a web portal for users to access, share, communicate, and interact with others and to facilitate business transactions; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing web-based access to leasing, finance, transaction, and product tracking and source data and services through a web operating system; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for business professionals to manage, store, organize, analyze, and share real estate data, financial, business transaction, and product tracking and source data and information; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for commercial real estate professionals to store, organize, analyze, manage and share real estate data, business transaction data, and product tracking and source data and information; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for profiling, compiling, storing, processing, tracking, analyzing, presenting and transmitting data for local market planning; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for profiling, compiling, storing, processing, tracking, analyzing, presenting and transmitting data of local market information; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for, compiling, storing, processing, tracking, analyzing, presenting and transmitting data for market analysis; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for compiling, storing, processing, tracking, analyzing, presenting and transmitting data for business research and business strategy; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for gathering and storing information, analysis, education, research, and feedback for enhancing manager and team performance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the digitization of business processes to enhance team performance and process | ACTIVE | Nov 18, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2017 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 2, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | PMSD | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - DENIED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |