USPTO serial 86870453
PRMC SCORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRMC SCORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WOOLWICH, ME
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES T. MILLIKEN
JAMES T. MILLIKEN MILLIKEN PLCSTE 9, 4643 EAST THOMAS RDPHOENIX, AZ 85018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE (SAAS) FEATURING SOFTWARE DESIGNED TO CAPTURE, EVALUATE AND DELIVER HEALTHCARE PROVIDER PERFORMANCE INFORMATION AND METRICS TO BOTH HEALTHCARE ADMINISTRATORS AND PROVIDERS IN THE FORM OF REAL-TIME DISPLAYS OF PATIENT FEEDBACK SERVICE EXCEPTIONS AND BEDSIDE SURVEYS TO CREATE A PROVIDER PERFORMANCE SCORE FOR A SPECIFIC VISIT AND A UNIQUE RUNNING SCORE FOR THE PROVIDER IN THE FORM OF A PRMC SCORE, WHICH IS KEPT AND CONTINUOUSLY UPDATED BASED UPON ALL PAST AND FUTURE PATIENT SERVICES RENDERED BY A SPECIFIC PROVIDER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |