Drawing for TRUPOWER

USPTO serial 86870924

TRUPOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUPOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward R. Courtney

EDWARD R. COURTNEY ECOLAB USA INC.1 Ecolab PlaceSAINT PAUL, MN 55102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products used in industry; detergents for use in industrial and manufacturing processes; chemical cleaning compositions for industrial purposes; chemical products used in warewashing processes; water treatment chemicals; chemical degreasing agentsACTIVE—
003Warewashing detergents, namely, detergents for machine dishwashing; dish detergent; dishwashing detergent; dishwashing presoaks; dish detergent rinses; rinse additives for dishwashing machines; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations for cutlery, crockery, dishes and cookwareACTIVE—
005Disinfectants and sanitizers for warewashingACTIVE—
009Measuring and dosing dispensers and computerized control systems comprised of a computer and circuitry for data collection and control of equipment for these goods; software for operating measuring and dosing dispensersACTIVE—
037Installation, repair and maintenance of warewashing machines and dishwashers and control systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 17, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 1, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2018TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 31, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 17, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 19, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 28, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2016MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance