USPTO serial 86871519
Serial No. 86871519
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 86871519?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CENTRAL, HONG KONG, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lin Xiao
LIN XIAO YOUNG BASILE HANLON & MACFARLANE P.C.3001 WEST BIG BEAVER ROADSUITE 624TROY, MI 48084Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for video and picture processing; Downloadable computer software for photograph and image processing; Recorded computer programs for photograph and image processing; Cameras; Electronic tags for goods; Electronic notice boards; Television sets; Data processing apparatus; Smartphones; Tablet computer; Computer game programs; 3D spectacles; Camcorders | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Video recording services; Planning arrangement of showing movies; Production of radio and television programs; Film production, other than advertising films; Photography; Videotape editing; Entertainment and educational services in the nature of competitions in the field of entertainment, education, culture, sports, and other non-business and non-commercial fields; Entertainment in the nature of beauty pageants; Non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazine in the field of beauty; Layout services, other than for advertising purposes; Entertainment in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of comedy and variety entertainment; Entertainment information; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; provision of non-downloadable films and television programs via a video on-demand service | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for image processing; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for video recording, video processing, and video sharing; Research and development of new products for others; Hosting the websites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Installation of computer software; Providing search engines for the Internet; Duplication of computer programs; Computer programming; Computer system design services; Providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; Consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; Off-site data backup; Electronic storage of electronic data; Cloud computing services featuring software for storing and processing images and videos; Creation and maintenance of web sites for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |