Drawing for ANNUITY EFFICIENT INCOME FRONTIER

USPTO serial 86871553

ANNUITY EFFICIENT INCOME FRONTIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, TRICIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANNUITY EFFICIENT INCOME FRONTIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amie Peele Carter

AMIE PEELE CARTER FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP300 N MERIDIAN STREETSUITE 2700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial services, namely, providing an investment option for the management and distribution of annuities and the management and distribution of life insurance productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 11, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 2, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 23, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 22, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 1, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 1, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 1, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 1, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 29, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 29, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance