USPTO serial 86873025
CREATING AMAZING EMPLOYEE EXPERIENCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CANTOR, JILLIAN REDDING
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CREATING AMAZING EMPLOYEE EXPERIENCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sydney NSW 2000, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudia W. Stangle
CLAUDIA W. STANGLE LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.TWO PRUDENTIAL PLAZA, 180 N. STETSON AVESUITE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Classified advertising services; classified advertising services on a global computer network; personnel recruitment services via a computer network; advertising services in the field of personnel recruitment; Consultancy of personnel recruitment; promotion of educational and professional development courses, namely, via a global computer network; Providing employment advice and information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |