Drawing for BEE LINE

USPTO serial 86873175

BEE LINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COHEN, ROBERT ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEE LINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Brian Pingel

G. BRIAN PINGEL BROWNWINICK LAW FIRMRUAN CENTER666 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 2000DES MOINES, IA 50309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Wheelchairs for the disabled and those with mobility difficultiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 29, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2016ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance